Legal Opinion
State v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 6, 1940PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The allegations of the amended in-formations in the cases of the defendants Nelson and Goodrich are substantially identical. Each information charges in three counts that the defendant “a duly qualified and licensed physician, in violation of Sections 6246 and 6562 of the General Statutes, ... assisted, abetted and counseled a married woman ... to use a certain [specified] spermatocidal drug . . . and a [specified] contraceptive device . . . for the purpose of preventing conception for the reason that in the opinion of [the defendant] as a physician, the preservation of the general health of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.