State v. Zazzaro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The defendant is charged in thirteen counts with violations of § 968e of the Cumulative Supplement, 1939, quoted in full in the footnote, 1 the alleged offenses being that he, a stockholder in a brewing company, extended credit for a period of more than thirty days, through various banks in Hartford, to designated holders of retail liquor permits issued by the liquor control commission. The charges are set forth in the information substantially in the language of the statute. There is involved a construction of § 968e, and the applicability of § 1083c of the Cumulative Supplement, 1935, also…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Pickerill v. SchottSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Frazier v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.