Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 31, 1930PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The assignments of error are numerous but most of them depend upon and are determined by a few general propositions. The first of these is the applicability, to the charges, of the statutes upon which the prosecution is based. The first twenty-six counts of the information were founded upon and brought under § 6364 of the General Statutes, which reads as follows: “Any officer or agent of any public, municipal or private corporation, any executor, administrator, guardian, conservator and any trustee under a testamentary or express trust, who shall wrongfully appropriate and convert to his own…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. State v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. People v. Detroit White Lead Works Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hoxie v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. State v. VarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. State v. MercerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API