Legal Opinion
State v. Muolo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1935PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The assistant city attorney of the city of New Haven filed an information in the City Court against the defendant charging that, on September 8th, 1933, being an operator of a taxicab owned by the Terminal Taxi Company, he used a certain taxi stand on the easterly side of College Street in that city, in connection with the Hotel Taft, established by the board of police commissioners of the city acting as traffic authority and traffic commission of the city, with the approval of the owner of the hotel, the use of the stand being limited to taxicabs operated by the New England Taxi Cab Company,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Snyder v. Town of NewtownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.