Legal Opinion
Jennings Oil Co., Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 21, 1982No. 77 Civ. 1398 (HFW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WERKER, District Judge.
Defendant Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 as to Counts II and III of the amended complaint. Mobil also seeks decertification of the class on Count III. Plaintiffs have cross-moved for summary judgment on Count III of the amended complaint.
The background of this case is set forth in the Court’s opinion conditionally certifying the action as a class action, see Jennings Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp., 80 F.R.D. 124 (S.D.N.Y.1978), and in the opinion denying Mobil’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Count…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hayden Publishing Co., Inc. v. Cox Broadcasting Corp. And United Technical Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Sunshine Cellular v. Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. WorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Remington Products, Inc. v. North American Philips Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.