Legal Opinion
Disenos Artisticos E Industriales, S.A. v. Work
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 30, 1989No. 83 Civ. 4149, 84 Civ. 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, counterde-fendants have moved for summary judgment on the antitrust counterclaims. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.
DISCUSSION
Counterplaintiffs’ antitrust claims challenge the legality of restrictions placed on retailers of Lladro figurines by the sole United States distributor of those figurines, Weil Ceramics & Glass (“Weil”). These restrictions require Lladro retailers to sell Lladro figurines only at retail — that is, not to customers who wish to resell them — and only from locations approved by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Domed Stadium Hotel, Inc., D/B/A Holiday Inn-Superdome v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Hayden Publishing Co., Inc. v. Cox Broadcasting Corp. And United Technical Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green Country Food Market, Inc. v. Bottling Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Robert Bogan and Scott Bogan v. Austin E. Hodgkins, Jr., Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Emigra Group, LLC v. Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Discon, Inc. v. Nynex Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- In re Am. Express Anti-Steering Rules Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.