Legal Opinion
Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1997No. 94 Civil 2120 (LMM)PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McKENNA, District Judge.
Family board game manufacturer Anti-Monopoly, Inc. (“AMI”) commenced this antitrust action against its competitor, Hasbro, Inc. (“Hasbro”), alleging, among other things, violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, §§ 3 and 7 of the Clayton Act, the Robinson-Patman Act, and state law. 1 Has bro moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss AMFs Second Amended Complaint. Hasbro also moves for partial judgment on the pleadings to dismiss AMFs secondary-line Robinson-Patman Act claims. 2 For the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Brandon v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Douglas v. Victor Capital GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Laface v. E. Suffolk BocesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Doubleline Capital LP v. Odebrecht Fin., Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Atkins v. County of OrangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.