Legal Opinion
Sunshine Cellular v. Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 1992No. 92 Civ. 3194 (RLC)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
I
Plaintiff Sunshine Cellular (“Sunshine”) is a Maryland general partnership which provides nonwireline cellular telephone service in a Pennsylvania service area known as “Pennsylvania 8.” Defendant Vanguard Cellular Systems, Inc. (“Vanguard”) is a North Carolina corporation which provides nonwireline cellular telephone service for a cluster of service areas known as the “Pennsylvania Supersystem.”
Vanguard’s Pennsylvania Supersystem territory includes FCC-designated service areas in much of Eastern Pennsylvania as well as portions of New York and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Eskofot A/S v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Capitol Records, LLC v. VideoEgg, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Constitution Reinsurance Corp. v. Stonewall InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.