Legal Opinion
Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 14, 1968No. 335PublishedCited by 922 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
Hanover Shoe, Inc. (hereafter Hanover) is a manufacturer of shoes and a customer of United Shoe Machinery Corporation (hereafter United), a manufacturer and distributor of shoe machinery. In 1954 this Court affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 110 F. Supp. 295 (1953), in favor of the United States in a civil action against United under § 4 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, 15 U. S. C. § 4. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States, 347 U. S. 521. In 1955, Hanover brought the present treble-damage action against United in the District Court for the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by922 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
917 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.