Legal Opinion

Baird v. Duane

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1869No. 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Fourth Judicial District, San Francisco County.

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action to recover the possession of land. The case was tried with a jury. The verdict was for the plaintiffs. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied. The defendants have made a number of points, which we shall consider very briefly in the order in which they have been presented.

1. If the court below erred in not allowing the challenge for cause to the juror Brownstone, the error was without prejudice. He was subsequently challenged peremptorily, and the defendants were not prejudiced by being compelled to use one of their peremptory challenges in his case, for they…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Richardson v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Piercy v. SabinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TroutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Allen v. McMillionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Smeland v. RenwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API