Smeland v. Renwick
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered upon an order granting a nonsuit upon a motion made immediately upon the close of plaintiff’s case.
The defendants, with the exception of defendant Frank V. Smith, were directors of a corporation designated and known as the “San Joaquin Valley Electric Railway,” which was incorporated on October 3, 1908, under the laws of this state and remained in existence as such until March 1, 1913, when, according to the complaint, its charter was duly declared forfeited because of its failure to pay its corporate license tax, as required by law,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Newman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hodgkins v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Silver v. ShemanskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Kreling v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Booth v. BondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Jacobson v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.