Legal Opinion

Richardson v. McNulty

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventeenth Judicial District, Sierra County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover an undivided sixteenth interest in a certain mining claim, situated in the County of Sierra. The defense mainly relied upon is abandonment. On the trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence the judgment roll in a certain action brought by him against one Donahue & West-field to recover the same interest sued for in this action, to which the defendants were not parties or privies. The judg*343meat roll was admitted by the Court under the exception of the defendants. Touching the effect of the judgment roll as evidence, the Court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGarrity v. ByingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Bird v. LisbrosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Stephens v. MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Hubbard v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Bequette v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Farmers Canal Co. v. FrankNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Strepey v. StarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  5. Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API