Frosted Fruit Products Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cline, Judge;
This is a suit against the United States arising at the port of Los Angeles in which the plaintiff seeks to recover a part of the duty assessed on frozen guavas imported from Mexico.
The collector classified the merchandise as fruits in their natural state, not specially provided for, and assessed duty thereon at 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiff claims that duty should have been assessed at 17K per *120centum ad valorem under the provisions of trade agreements with Guatemala (T. D. 48317), El Salvador (T. D. 48947), Costa Rica (T.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. ConkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Conkey v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. MakaroffCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Mackay Estate v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Christo Poulos & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.