Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 4, 1959No. C.D. 2132PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DoNloN, Judge:

The merchandise of this suit is described in the entry papers as frozen ground shrimp shells. These shells (together with salmon eggs, as to which there is no issue) were imported from Canada at Blaine, Wash., on October 30, 1957.

Plaintiff entered the shells as nonenumerated manufactured articles under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739, and the President’s Proclamation (T.D. 52827), effective October 7, 1951, subject to duty at the rate of 10 per centum ad va-lorem. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ConkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Lackawanna Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. Frosted Fruit Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  4. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woolart Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API