Legal Opinion

Conkey v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1928No. 2925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court. The merchandise involved consists of frozen lamb imported from the Argentine. It was assessed for duty by the collector at 4 cents per pound as fresh lamb under the provisions therefor in paragraph 702 of the Tariff Act of 1922.

The paragraph reads as follows:

Par. 702. Sheep and goats, $2 per head; fresh mutton and goat meat, 2J^ cents per pound; fresh lamb, 4 cents per pound.

The importers contend that the merchandise is dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem as “meats, * * * prepared or preserved, not specially provided for,”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. ConkeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frosted Fruit Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  2. Mackay Estate v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Green Giant Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. Green Giant Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API