United States v. Conkey
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
This appeal involves the classification of frozen lamb imported from the Argentine.
Duty was assessed by the collector at the port of Boston at 4 cents per pound, under paragraph 702 of the tariff act of 1922, as “fresh lamb.” The importers protested, claiming that it was dutiable at 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 706 of the same act, as “meats prepared, or preserved.’ ’ The importers alternatively claimed that the merchandise was dutiable under paragraph 1459 of said act at 10 per cent ad valorem, or, if not so, that it was dutiable under the same paragraph at 20 per cent ad valorem.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Stouffer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Isler v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- Causse Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Habicht v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Hansen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Allied Food Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Frosted Fruit Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.