Legal Opinion

Andrews-Cooper Lumber Co. v. Hayworth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

Tbe answer to tbe 4th issue submitted to tbe jury at the trial of this action in tbe municipal court of High Point is determinative of tbe right of tbe plaintiff to recover of tbe defendants, B. M. Hay-wortb and bis wife, Delpbia Haywortb, on tbe cause of action alleged in tbe complaint. These defendants admit in tbeir answer tbat tbey were indebted to tbeir codefendants, Gurney Loflin and J. R. Hawkins, on 5 January, 1932, in tbe sum of $1,000. Tbey allege tbat tbey paid said sum on said day. Tbe burden was on the Said defendants to sus tain this defense. In apt time, tbe plaintiff requested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Graham v. Proctorville WarehouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Dewey Bros. v. MargolisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Paris v. Carolina Builders CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Parker v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Dixon v. IpockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Dixon v. . IpockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API