Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1954No. 749PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The defendant insists initially that it is entitled to a reversal of the judgment because all of the testimony disproves the plaintiff’s claim. The defendant advances these four independent and successive arguments to sustain this position :

1. The entire evidence compels the single conclusion that the plaintiff, acting through his agent, accepted Bush’s check as absolute payment of the purchase price of the Chrysler, and that in consequence the ownership as well as the' possession of the automobile passed to Bush at the time of its delivery to him.

2. The entire evidence compels the single…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Woodard v. MordecaiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Lance v. Butler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Thomas v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  5. American Exchange National Bank v. WinderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Peed v. Burleson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Nasco Equipment Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Rhone-Poulenc Agro, S.A. (Now Known as Aventis Cropscience Sa) v. Dekalb Genetics Corporation v. Monsanto Company (Now Known as Pharmacia Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. King Homes, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API