Legal Opinion

Paris v. Carolina Builders Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1956No. 455PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The Commission, upon its own motion, or upon the application of any party in interest, on the grounds of a change in condition, may review any award and on such review may make an award ending, diminishing, or increasing the compensation previously awarded, subject to the maximum or minimum compensation allowable by the Compensation Act. Provided, however, no such review shall be made after twelve months'; from the date of the last payment of compensation pursuant to an award as provided in'the Act, or when no award has been made for compensation no such review shall -be made after twelve…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Hunter v. . WetsellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Kendrick v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Hooker v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Tucker v. LowdermilkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Smith v. Mecklenburg County Chapter American Red CrossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Parnell-Martin Supply Co. v. High Point Motor Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Willis v. J. M. Davis Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Consolidated Freightways v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API