Legal Opinion

Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1925PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaesee, J.

An action was instituted in the Superior Court of Davidson County between the same parties, and on the same policy, and removed to the District Court of the United States, at Greensboro, and there tried. In this first action, $6,000 was demanded on account of tbe double indemnity provision in tbe policy. Plaintiff there recovered, but, upon writ of error in the Circuit Court of Appeals, the judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reversed, and the action remanded for a new trial.

Upon examination of the authorities we are convinced that the reasoning contained in the opinion of Circuit Judge…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Underwood v. Security Life and Annuity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Pitt v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Holly v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Philadelphia Life Ins. v. HayworthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  5. Murphy v. Lafayette Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Cleve v. Craven Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  4. Allen v. National Accident & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Hare v. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co. of HartfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API