Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Barrow
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
Defendants admit in their answer the execution of the-note as alleged in the complaint. As a defense to plaintiff’s cause of action, upon this note, defendants plead payment of tbe installment due on 1 December, 1923.- They thereby assumed tbe burden u}3on tbe issues raised by tbe pleadings and submitted to tbe jury. Ellison v. Rix, 85 N. C., 80. At tbe conclusion of tbe evidence offered by defendants, plaintiffs moved for judgment upon tbe admissions in tbe pleadings, contending tbat tbe evidence offered by defendants was not sufficient to sustain affirmative answers to tbe issues. Tbe…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Malloy v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1922
- Bank v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Ellison v. . RixSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Cleve v. Craven Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Morris v. . CleveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.