Legal Opinion
Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 5, 1951No. 9584PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
This is a proceeding to review Part III of an order of the Federal Trade Commission entered on Count III of a complaint •filed by the Commission on February 23, 1943, charging in three counts violation by petitioner of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 45, § 3 of the Clayton Act, and § 2 of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 14 and 13. We shall refer to petitioner as M-H. Since M-H does not challenge Parts I and II of the order based on the first two counts of the complaint we shall make no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Samuel H. Moss, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whitaker Cable Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, a Corporation, and Lloyd A. Fry, Sr. And Lloyd A. Fry, Jr. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Ingram v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1966
- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Federal Trade Commission. No.9584Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951