Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 26, 1951No. 42PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
We brought this case here because on an important phase in the administration of the National Labor Relations Act it was in conflict with Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board, 179 F. 2d 749, just decided, ante, p. 474. Our decision in that case controls this. Since the court below applied what we have found to be the requisite standard in reviewing an order of the Labor Board, there remains only the contention that in any event there was no justification for the court below to find the Board’s order to be unsupported “by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.” This is an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. Hooe Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1805
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western Well Works, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.