Legal Opinion

Samuel H. Moss, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 29, 1945No. 136PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from (petition to review) an order of the Federal Trade Commission directing the petitioner not to discriminate in the price of rubber stamps sold in interstate commerce. 1’lie only points which we find it necessary to discuss are whether the findings support the order; whether there was evidence to support the findings; and whether the petitioner was prevented from introducing relevant evidence. After finding that the petitioner was engaged in interstate commerce in the sale of rubber stamps, the Commission found that it had sold stamps of the same size at different prices…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. A. E. Staley Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. A. E. Staley Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. John B. Hull, Inc., the Sandmeyer Oil Company, Community Petroleum Products, Inc., and Dutchess Auto Co. v. Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API