Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Stone
Petitioners, a parent corporation and its sales subsidiary, use a basing point system of pricing in their sales of glucose. They sell only at delivered prices, computed by adding to a base price at Chicago the published freight tariff from Chicago to the several points of delivery, even though deliveries are in fact made from their factory at Kansas City as well as from their Chicago factory. Consequently there is included in the delivered price on shipments from Kansas Cty an amount of "freight” which usually does not correspond to freight actually paid by petitioners.
The Federal Trade…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cochrane v. DeenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Maple Flooring Manufacturers Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Parker v. Motor Boat Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.