Ingram v. Phillips Petroleum Company
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This case is before the Court on an alleged violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, Title 15 U.S.C. § 13. The case was tried to the Court, taken under advisement, and the matter now stands submitted. Inasmuch as there is little dis pute concerning the basic facts in the case, formal findings are deemed unnecessary and the pertinent facts as found by the Court will be set forth in this opinion.
The plaintiffs pray for injunctive relief only. Previously, the complaint also alleged a conspiracy to violate the Sherman Act on the part of Phillips…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Women's Sportswear Manufacturers Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bel Air Markets v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1972
- OM Droney Beverage Co. v. Miller Brewing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
- Winrock Enterprises, Inc. v. House of Fabrics of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Palmer News, Inc. v. ARA Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1979
- U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distribution, Inc. v. Innovation Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021