Legal Opinion

Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 17, 2005No. 2 CA-CV 2004-0199PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this declaratory relief action (DRA) that involves a Morris 1 agreement, appellants Bunny Martin and her husband appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Arizona Property and Casualty Insurance Fund (Fund). Martin contends the trial court erred in allowing the Fund to litigate alleged liability issues in the coverage phase of this case. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court’s decision.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On appeal from a summary judgment, we view the facts “in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Rowland v. Great States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. American Family Insurance Comp v. Milo BergesonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API