Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 14, 2007No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0116PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Richard Acosta appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company on his third-party bad faith claim. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment and remand this matter for proceedings consistent with this decision.

Standard of Review

¶ 2 We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Andrews v. Blake, 205 Ariz. 236, ¶ 12, 69 P.3d 7, 11 (2003). We will affirm a summary judgment only if there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Parsons v. Continental National American GroupArizona Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Merkens v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health AllianceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Green Cross Medical, Inc. v. GallyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Medical Protective Co. v. PangDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API