Acosta v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Richard Acosta appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company on his third-party bad faith claim. For the following reasons, we reverse the judgment and remand this matter for proceedings consistent with this decision.
Standard of Review
¶ 2 We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. Andrews v. Blake, 205 Ariz. 236, ¶ 12, 69 P.3d 7, 11 (2003). We will affirm a summary judgment only if there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. LittleArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Parsons v. Continental National American GroupArizona Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Merkens v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Wyckoff v. Mogollon Health AllianceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Green Cross Medical, Inc. v. GallyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Medical Protective Co. v. PangDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.