Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Great States Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 24, 2001No. 2 CA-CV 00-0082PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELANDER, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellees/cross-appellants Great States Insurance Company and Patti Marsillo (collectively, Great States) included independent medical examination (IME) expenses in Great States’s workers’ compensation lien against appellant/cross-appellee Lane Rowland’s third-party tort settlement. Rowland objected and sued Great States on various theories. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Great States but denied its request for attorney’s fees. The court also denied Rowland’s subsequent motion to amend his complaint to include a claim for declaratory relief. Rowland…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Noble v. National American Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Miller v. HehlenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. SOLIMENO v. YonanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API