Legal Opinion

Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2014No. CV-14-0093-CQPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vice Chief Justice PELANDER,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has certified the following question for our review:

Whether a default judgment against insured-defendants that was entered pursuant to a Damron agreement that stipulated facts determinative of both liability and coverage has (1) collateral estoppel effect and precludes litigation of that issue in a subsequent coverage action against the insurer, as held in Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood, [209 Ariz. 137,] 98 P.3d 572 ([ ]App.2004), or (2) no preclusive or binding effect, as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Marcus Labertew v. Loral LangemeierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Teufel v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Desert Ridge Resort LLC v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  4. Dove v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. 757BD LLC v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PADistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API