Legal Opinion

Quinn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 1925No. Nos. 24,640, 24,641PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Two actions: One to recover $1,075, alleged to have been paid under duress, was tried to a jury; the other to annul a deed for the same cause was submitted upon the same evidence to the judge who tried the jury case. There was a verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the first case, and likewise findings in their favor in the second case. From orders denying judgment non obstante or a new trial, and denying amendments of the findings or a new trial, the cases come here.

George A. Quinn, the son of plaintiffs, was cashier in a Minneapolis bank. Defendant had given its bond indemnifying the bank…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Bell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Holland v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Williamson v. AckermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diescher v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
  2. Meylink v. Minnehaha Co-Operative Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  3. O'NEIL v. DuxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Bank of Tucson v. AdrianDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
  5. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. GuntzburgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API