Quinn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Two actions: One to recover $1,075, alleged to have been paid under duress, was tried to a jury; the other to annul a deed for the same cause was submitted upon the same evidence to the judge who tried the jury case. There was a verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the first case, and likewise findings in their favor in the second case. From orders denying judgment non obstante or a new trial, and denying amendments of the findings or a new trial, the cases come here.
George A. Quinn, the son of plaintiffs, was cashier in a Minneapolis bank. Defendant had given its bond indemnifying the bank…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Galusha v. ShermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Morse v. WoodworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Bell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Holland v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Williamson v. AckermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diescher v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
- Meylink v. Minnehaha Co-Operative Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- O'NEIL v. DuxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Bank of Tucson v. AdrianDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. GuntzburgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937