Legal Opinion
O'NEIL v. Dux
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 4, 1960No. 37,783PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This matter is before us on appeal from an order of the District Court of Ramsey County denying to defendant judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. By his complaint plaintiff asserted that the defendants Albert J. Dux, Jr., and Leonard G. Neary executed and delivered to him a promissory note in the sum of $9,178.78; that the remaining defendants, including appellant, George Haub, guaranteed the payment of the note. The complaint specifically set out the undertaking signed by Haub by which he agreed to guarantee partial payment of the note limited to the sum of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- State ex rel. Blaisdell v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Juster Bros. Inc. v. ChristgauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Bardwell v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Baker v. Citizens State Bank of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Southdale Center, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Bank of Tucson v. AdrianDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.