Legal Opinion

Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Guntzburger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 19, 1937No. 31,183PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff prevailed in its action to recover upon a promissory note. The only answering defendant is appellant, August Guntzburger (so Ave shall hereafter refer to him alone as defendant), who appeals from an order denying his motion for new trial after the court had instructed the jury to return a verdict against him.

Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of underwriting, as surety, fidelity contracts of persons holding positions of trust, particularly for those who by virtue of their employment have the handling of funds for their employers. As such it…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. HellingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Quinn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Tucson v. AdrianDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1964
  2. State v. LahiffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API