Legal Opinion
Bank of Tucson v. Adrian
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 30, 1964No. 4-63 Civ. 364PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
This cause came before the Court for trial without a jury.
The suit involves a promissory note in the sum of $24,214.30, together with interest and attorneys’ fees. It is admitted that the note was executed and delivered to plaintiff by the defendants in the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, on May 29, *5961963, and was due 90 days after the date of execution. Defendants Monica B. Bjornnes and John T. Bessesen, sometimes referred to hereafter as Monica and John, deny liability by reason of lack of consideration and duress. Defendant Henry J. Adrian, also known by other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American National Bank v. HellingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Brown County Bank v. HageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- O'NEIL v. DuxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Quinn v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Malmquist v. McChordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Houston Chemical Plant v. SanfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- The Bank of Tucson, an Arizona Corporation v. Monica B. Bjornnes and John T. BessesenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965