Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Brown

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 1998No. C95-4073 DR; CA A96939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Husband appeals from the entry of a stipulated judgment in a dissolution case. Wife moves to dismiss the appeal as one from a nonappealable judgment. Because the issue on appeal involves whether husband consented to the judgment, we deny wife’s motion.

Wife filed a petition for a judgment of separation and division of property. Husband filed a counter-petition for dissolution of marriage. The parties agreed to proceed with the case as a dissolution rather than a separation matter. At a pretrial hearing, the parties stipulated to a settlement agreement and read that agreement into the record.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Schoren v. SchorenOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rader v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Russell v. SheahanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Westfall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. SumpterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Department of Human Services v. K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. In re the Marriage of HoogendamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. In re the Marriage of AskaMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. In re the Marriage of HaggertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API