Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Sumpter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 2005No. 021022J02; A126366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Mother appeals a stipulated judgment terminating her parental rights, arguing that she did not validly waive her right to a trial. See Brown and Shiban, 155 Or App 238, 240-41, 963 P2d 105 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 594 (1999) (although generally no appeal lies from a stipulated judgment, a party may challenge the validity of her consent to such a judgment); ORS 419A.205(1)(c) (any final disposition of a petition under the juvenile code is appealable). For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

The relevant facts in this case are procedural. In October 2003, the Department of Human…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. GornickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Department of Human Services v. A. S.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Department of Human Services v. K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Department of Human Services v. Z. E. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API