Schoren v. Schoren
Oregon Supreme Court
From Wasco: Feed W. Wilson, Judge. Department 2. This is an appeal from a decree annulling the marriage status of the parties hereto and determining their rights to certain real property. Christena Schoren and Mathias Schoren have been twice married to each other. They were first married September 2, 1893, and, after living together for about nineteen years, were divorced. About three years thereafter they were remarried and, after five years, they again appear in court.
Read the full summary
From Wasco: Feed W. Wilson, Judge. Department 2. This is an appeal from a decree annulling the marriage status of the parties hereto and determining their rights to certain real property. Christena Schoren and Mathias Schoren have been twice married to each other. They were first married September 2, 1893, and, after living together for about nineteen years, were divorced. About three years thereafter they were remarried and, after five years, they again appear in court. Three children were born to them during their first marriage, two of whom had attained their majority and the youngest…
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
1. The appeal in this case having been taken from the whole of the decree, we are required to try this suit anew, “upon the transcript and evidence accompanying it.” Or. L., § 556. Also see Or. L., § 405. Hence, a number of matters discussed in the appellant’s brief may not be referred to in this opinion.
Entering upon the trial of this canse de novo, we are confronted with the question as to the sufficiency of the proof to warrant the court in granting a divorce.
2. In this state, a divorce may be granted for a number of causes:
“5. Willful desertion for the period of one year;
“6. Cruel and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Schooner Hoppet & Cargo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Biays v. Chesapeake InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Southwick v. SouthwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Hexamer v. HexamerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Stewart v. StewartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Garner v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Russell v. SheahanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Dillon v. . WentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Coolsaet v. City of VeblenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- MOELLER ET UX v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.