Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Wilson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1970PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The only question is the power of the trial court to change the provisions of a consent decree of foreclosure over the objection of one of the parties.

The plaintiff and his assignees owned a restaurant business, including the equipment and fixtures. Plaintiff was the lessee of the premises upon which the business was operated. Plaintiff sold the business to the defendants upon an installment contract. The defendants were assigned the lease and assumed the obligation of paying the rent due under the lease; however, plaintiff was still obligated to the landlord for the rent.

Plaintiff brought a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stites v. McGeeOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Rader v. BarrOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Milton J. Wershow Co. v. McVeety MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Russell v. SheahanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Webber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Douglas Construction & Supply Corp. v. Wholesale Center of North Main Street, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API