Legal Opinion
Russell v. Sheahan
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1996No. CC 92-CV-0067; CA A81742; SC S41379PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.
The court is asked to determine whether, in the circumstances of this case, a stipulated judgment entered pursuant to ORCP 54 E is appealable. We hold that it is not.
Plaintiff, an employee of defendants, filed a complaint alleging that defendants had failed to pay plaintiff and other employees in conformance with the state’s minimum wage laws. Plaintiff brought the claim on behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated employees and sought monetary damages, attorney fees, and declaratory and injunctive relief. The complaint requested certification as a class action 1 and appointment of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Lumber Co. v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Department of Human Services v. S. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Rauda v. Oregon Roses, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- For Counsel, Inc. v. Northwest Web Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.