Legal Opinion

Swisher v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1996No. 22304PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order summarily dismissing Arden Swisher’s application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Swisher asserts that the district court erred in failing to rule upon Swisher’s request for appointed counsel before considering the merits of Swisher’s claims and by summarily dismissing Swisher’s application. We conclude that the district court committed error in failing to act upon Swisher’s motion for appointed counsel before the court addressed the merits of the application, but we further conclude that this error was harmless because the claims asserted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lawny Lamar Browning v. Richard A. Vernon, Director Ron McKinseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. WadeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Browning v. VernonDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1994
  5. Bell v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hust v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Melton v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Dale Carter Shackelford v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. WarrenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Freeland v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API