Legal Opinion
State v. Warren
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 2001No. 25594, 26095, 26096PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwartzman, Chief Judge
In this consolidated appeal, Phillip Allen Warren argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to felony eluding an officer, in denying his I.C.R. 35 motion for correction of sentence, and in summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm the district court’s orders denying Warren’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, his Rule 35 motion, and his application for post-conviction relief.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On July 22, 1998, police officers were called to assist parole officers in seizing a subject wanted on a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WeberIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
- Brockway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
- State v. Lynn Lewis SchwabIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- Melvin Arthur McCabe v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.