Legal Opinion

Melton v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2009No. 35855PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Justice.

Raymond J. Melton appeals from the order of the district court summarily dismissing his successive petition for post-conviction relief. Melton contends that the district court erred in failing to grant, or even rule upon, his motion for appointment of counsel, and that the court erred in summarily dismissing his successive petition. He argues that these errors necessitate a remand of his case to the district court for appointment of counsel and an evidentiary hearing on his claims. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Melton appeals from the district court’s summary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Charboneau v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Workman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Swader v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dale Carter Shackelford v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Doe v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Chaput v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Arrats v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Caudill v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API