Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1996No. 21713PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

John Jákes Bell filed an application for post-conviction relief alleging that he was deprived of due process in jurisdictional review proceedings. The district court summarily dismissed Bell’s application on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitation. Finding no error in the district court’s decision, we affirm.

Bell was convicted of vehicular manslaughter and aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol. The district court imposed a unified seven-year sentence with a three-year minimum term of incarceration for vehicular manslaughter and a consecutive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. WolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McKinney v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. GittinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Fox v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. HansonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Henman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API