Legal Opinion

Hust v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 2009No. 35246PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Chief Judge.

Lonnie Hust appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Hust asserts that the court committed reversible error by not acting on his request for post-conviction counsel.

I

BACKGROUND

Hust was convicted of lewd conduct with a minor, Idaho Code § 18-1508. Hust did not file a direct appeal, but did file a pro se petition for post-conviction relief nearly eighteen months later. In his petition, Hust asserted that he had been given ineffective assistance of counsel by his trial attorney’s failure to file a direct appeal in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Charboneau v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Goodwin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Martinez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Plant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Kent Hall v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Ex parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Hill v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API