Hust v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Chief Judge.
Lonnie Hust appeals from the district court’s summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Hust asserts that the court committed reversible error by not acting on his request for post-conviction counsel.
I
BACKGROUND
Hust was convicted of lewd conduct with a minor, Idaho Code § 18-1508. Hust did not file a direct appeal, but did file a pro se petition for post-conviction relief nearly eighteen months later. In his petition, Hust asserted that he had been given ineffective assistance of counsel by his trial attorney’s failure to file a direct appeal in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Charboneau v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Goodwin v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- Martinez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
- Plant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Kent Hall v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ex parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Hill v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.