Legal Opinion
Lawny Lamar Browning v. Richard A. Vernon, Director Ron McKinsey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 1995No. 94-35136PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants, Richard Vernon and Ron McKinsey, appeal the district court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, a class of inmates in the North Idaho Correctional Institution, filed this action alleging due process violations in the administration of Idaho’s retained jurisdiction program. Vernon and McKinsey contend that they are entitled to qualified immunity from damages because the allegations in the complaint do not constitute violations of a clearly established liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause. The district court had…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Jeffers v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jeffers v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Estate of Jeffrey Ford v. Ramirez-PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Loraine Mullins Charles Mullins v. State of Oregon Oregon Children's Services Division Kay Dean Toran, Administrator Mary AcklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- P.B. v. KochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.