Griswold v. City of Homer
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
After the Homer City Council passed an ordinance limiting the floor area of stores in three City of Homer zoning districts to between 20,000 and 45,000 square feet, Homer residents passed an initiative that increased the area to 66,000 square feet for all three zoning districts. Homer resident Frank Griswold sued the city and argued that the initiative was invalid for various reasons. The superior court upheld the initiative and granted summary judgment to the city. Griswold appeals, arguing that zoning is not a proper subject for an initiative. Because…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens Coalition for Tort Reform, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Garvin v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Alaska Action Center, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Trust Nos. 8295, 8297, 8298, 8299, 8300 & 8301 v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. OberlatzAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Carmony v. McKechnieAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.