Carmony v. McKechnie
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The proponent of a municipal ballot initiative challenges a superior court ruling affirming the borough clerk's rejection of his petition application, as well as the court's award of attorney's fees. The clerk and the superi- or court rejected the petition on grounds (1) that the proposed ordinance was not enforceable as a matter of law, (2) that it related to administrative rather than legislative matters, and (8) that the proposed measure was a referendum and the application failed to comply with the statutory and constitutional requirements for a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Alaska Action Center, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Thompson v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. OberlatzAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Sitkans for Responsible Government v. City & Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.