Legal Opinion

Carmony v. McKechnie

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2009No. S-13143PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The proponent of a municipal ballot initiative challenges a superior court ruling affirming the borough clerk's rejection of his petition application, as well as the court's award of attorney's fees. The clerk and the superi- or court rejected the petition on grounds (1) that the proposed ordinance was not enforceable as a matter of law, (2) that it related to administrative rather than legislative matters, and (8) that the proposed measure was a referendum and the application failed to comply with the statutory and constitutional requirements for a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Alaska Action Center, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Thompson v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Lake & Peninsula Borough Assembly v. OberlatzAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Alliance of Concerned Taxpayers, Inc. v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Tweedy v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough Board of Adjustment and AppealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Sitkans for Responsible Government v. City & Borough of SitkaAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API