Legal Opinion

Griswold v. City of Homer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2011No. S-13734PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Frank Griswold, a resident of Homer, filed a notice of appeal of the Homer Advisory Planning Commission's grant of a conditional-use permit to a mariculture association. The city clerk rejected his appeal for lack of standing because Griswold did not show that the permitted action would have an adverse effect on the use, enjoyment, or value of his property, and because Griswold's interests were not distinct from those of the general public. Griswold appealed that rejection to the superior court, which affirmed. We affirm the superior court's decision…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Oels v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Patterson v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Patrick v. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage Transportation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Native Village of Tununak v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API