Griswold v. City of Homer
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Frank Griswold, a resident of Homer, filed a notice of appeal of the Homer Advisory Planning Commission's grant of a conditional-use permit to a mariculture association. The city clerk rejected his appeal for lack of standing because Griswold did not show that the permitted action would have an adverse effect on the use, enjoyment, or value of his property, and because Griswold's interests were not distinct from those of the general public. Griswold appealed that rejection to the superior court, which affirmed. We affirm the superior court's decision…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Oels v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Patterson v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Patrick v. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage Transportation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Native Village of Tununak v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.