Legal Opinion

Municipality of Anchorage v. Frohne

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1977No. 3050, 3104PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEVER, C. J., and RABI-NO WITZ, CONNOR and BURKE, JJ. RABINO WITZ, Justice.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise from two final orders of the superior court. The first permanently enjoined appellant from “disbursing funds from the treasury of the Municipality of Anchorage except in accordance with appropriations authorized by ordinance.” The second ordered that an initiative petition which was circulated by cross-appellant and certified as legally sufficient by the clerk of the Greater Anchorage Area Borough should not be submitted to the voters of the Municipality of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Blotter v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Farley v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Atchison Board of Education v. De KaySupreme Court of the United States · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McAlpine v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thomas v. BaileyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Yute Air Alaska, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Kodiak Island Borough v. MahoneyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Whitson v. AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API