Legal Opinion

Setchell v. Dellacroce

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1969No. 22253PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

This is an action to compel specific performance of an alleged oral agreement to refinance certain real property or to permit the redemption of the property after the expiration of the period permitted by statute for redemption after foreclosure of a trust deed. In the event that specific performance should be unavailable, judgment for damages was demanded.

The record reflects that F. M. Setchell purchased certain real property from Raymond and Christine Dellacroce, who will hereinafter be referred to by last name only. Setchell made a down payment, assumed obligations under a first mortgage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andersen-Randolph Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Miller v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Canister Co. v. Leahy, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  4. Neikirk v. Boulder National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  5. Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Garhart Ex Rel. Tinsman v. Columbia/HealthOne, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Blades v. DaFoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Kaitz v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API